Review Literature as Topic
"Review Literature as Topic" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Works about published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. These articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art and may also include reviews as a literary form.
| Descriptor ID |
D012196
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
L01.178.682.759
|
| Concept/Terms |
State-of-the-Art Review- State-of-the-Art Review
- State of the Art Review
- State-of-the-Art Reviews
- Review, State-of-the-Art
- Reviews, State-of-the-Art
- State of the Art Reviews
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Review Literature as Topic".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Review Literature as Topic".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in this website by year, and whether "Review Literature as Topic" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2012 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in Profiles.
-
Freudenberg N. The Role of Social Movements in Reducing Harmful Corporate Practices Comment on "National Public Health Surveillance of Corporations in Key Unhealthy Commodity Industries - A Scoping Review and Framework Synthesis". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 13:8664.
-
Mondello S, Visalli C, Kobeissy F, Cacciani L, Cruciani F, D'Amato S, Di Napoli A, Giorgi Rossi P, Milli C, Petrelli A, Silvestri C, Cernigliaro A, Scondotto S. Exploring the evidence for the effectiveness of health interventions for COVID-19 targeting migrants: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 12 22; 11(12):e057985.
-
Gamble A, Baskin ML, Cranston KL, Herring SJ, Hinton E, Saulters MM, Moore JB, Welsch MA, Beech BM. Effects of eHealth interventions on physical activity and weight among pregnant and postpartum women and the sociodemographic characteristics of study populations: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 11; 18(11):2396-2403.
-
Schultz A, Goertzen L, Rothney J, Wener P, Enns J, Halas G, Katz A. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations. Res Synth Methods. 2018 Mar; 9(1):116-123.
-
Patel T, Tesfaldet B, Gandotra C. Pooled patient level data are better suited than study level data to investigate the link between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetes. BMJ. 2016 May 24; 353:i2920.
-
Enns J, Holmqvist M, Wener P, Halas G, Rothney J, Schultz A, Goertzen L, Katz A. Mapping interventions that promote mental health in the general population: A scoping review of reviews. Prev Med. 2016 06; 87:70-80.
-
Demment MM, Peters K, Dykens JA, Dozier A, Nawaz H, McIntosh S, Smith JS, Sy A, Irwin T, Fogg TT, Khaliq M, Blumenfeld R, Massoudi M, De Ver Dye T. Developing the Evidence Base to Inform Best Practice: A Scoping Study of Breast and Cervical Cancer Reviews in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0134618.
-
McLeroy KR, Northridge ME, Balcazar H, Greenberg MR, Landers SJ. Reporting guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health's adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Am J Public Health. 2012 May; 102(5):780-4.