Peter R. Hoffmann to Refraction, Ocular
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter R. Hoffmann has written about Refraction, Ocular.
Connection Strength
3.407
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Weisensee J, Fabian E, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252102.
Score: 0.684
-
Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Conversion of disclosed lens power formula constants. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Aug 01; 51(8):679-686.
Score: 0.228
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Cooke D, Hoffmann P, Wendelstein J. Prediction of refraction error after toric lens implantation with biometric input data uncertainties and power labelling tolerances. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan-Feb; 53(1):26-38.
Score: 0.216
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Wendelstein J, Cayless A, Hoffmann P, Gatinel D. Performance Evaluation of a Simple Strategy to Optimize Formula Constants for Zero Mean or Minimal Standard Deviation or Root-Mean-Squared Prediction Error in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan; 269:282-292.
Score: 0.215
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Wendelstein J, Cayless A, Hoffmann P, Goggin M. The Homburg-Adelaide toric IOL nomogram: How to predict corneal power vectors from preoperative IOLMaster 700 keratometry and total corneal power in toric IOL implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb; 103(1):e19-e30.
Score: 0.212
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Bolz M, Hoffmann P, Wendelstein J. Prediction of spectacle refraction uncertainties with discrete IOL power steps and manufacturing tolerances according to ISO using a Monte Carlo model. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 21; 108(6):793-800.
Score: 0.210
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Formula constant optimisation techniques including variation of keratometer or corneal refractive index and consideration for classical and modern IOL formulae. PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0282213.
Score: 0.193
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Preconditioning of clinical data for intraocular lens formula constant optimisation using Random Forest Quantile Regression Trees. Z Med Phys. 2024 Nov; 34(4):632-640.
Score: 0.193
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Bootstrap Outlier Identification in Clinical Datasets for Lens Power Formula Constant Optimization. Curr Eye Res. 2023 03; 48(3):263-269.
Score: 0.191
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, R?ggla V, Leydolt C, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population-How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation? PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0269709.
Score: 0.184
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Weisensee J, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Translation model for CW chord to angle Alpha derived from a Monte-Carlo simulation based on raytracing. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0267028.
Score: 0.183
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P. Strategies for formula constant optimisation for intraocular lens power calculation. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0267352.
Score: 0.182
-
Langenbucher A, Szentm?ry N, Weisensee J, Wendelstein J, Cayless A, Menapace R, Hoffmann P. Prediction model for best focus, power, and spherical aberration of the cornea: Raytracing on a large dataset of OCT data. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0247048.
Score: 0.168
-
Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Evaluation of corneal power from an AS-OCT thick lens model and ray tracing: reliability of the keratometer index. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 04 01; 50(4):360-368.
Score: 0.052
-
Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Evaluation of statistical correction strategies for corneal back surface astigmatism with toric lenses: a vector analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 04 01; 50(4):385-393.
Score: 0.052
-
Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 03 01; 50(3):201-208.
Score: 0.052
-
Wendelstein JA, Hoffmann PC, Hoffer KJ, Langenbucher A, Findl O, Ruiss M, Bolz M, Riaz KM, Pantanelli SM, Debellemani?re G, Gatinel D, Cooke DL, Galzignato A, Yeo TK, Seiler TG, Zinkernagel M, Savini G. Differences Between Keratometry and Total Keratometry Measurements in a Large Dataset Obtained With a Modern Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 04; 260:102-114.
Score: 0.051
-
Wendelstein JA, Rothb?cher J, Heath M, McDonald MC, Hoffmann PC, Cooke DL, Seiler TG, Langenbucher A, Riaz KM. Influence and predictive value of optional parameters in new-generation intraocular lens formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 08 01; 49(8):795-803.
Score: 0.050
-
Langenbucher A, Hoffmann P, Cayless A, Gatinel D, Debellemani?re G, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Considerations of a thick lens formula for intraocular lens power calculation. Z Med Phys. 2024 Nov; 34(4):620-631.
Score: 0.048
-
Langenbucher A, Schrecker J, Cayless A, Hoffmann P, Wendelstein J, Szentm?ry N. Calculation of Equivalent and Toric Power in AddOn Lenses Based on a Monte Carlo Simulation. Ophthalmic Res. 2022; 65(3):300-309.
Score: 0.045