Comparative Effectiveness Research

"Comparative Effectiveness Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

Conduct and synthesis of systematic research comparing interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor health conditions. The purpose of this research is to inform patients, providers, and decision-makers, responding to their expressed needs, about which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. (hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/draftdefinition.html accessed 6/12/2009)

Descriptor ID	D057186
MeSH Number(s)	H01.770.644.145.360.500 N05.425.157
Concept/Terms	Comparative Effectiveness Research Comparative Effectiveness Research Effectiveness Research, Comparative Research, Comparative Effectiveness

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

Natural Sciences [H]
Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
Science [H01.770]
Research [H01.770.644]
Biomedical Research [H01.770.644.145]
Health Services Research [H01.770.644.145.360]
Comparative Effectiveness Research [H01.770.644.145.360.500]
Health Care [N]
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation [N05]
Health Services Research [N05.425]
Comparative Effectiveness Research [N05.425.157]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is related to "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Comparative Effectiveness Research".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Comparative Effectiveness Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 13 publications over 8 distinct years, with a maximum of 3 publications in 2013 and 2018

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2011	0	1	1
2012	0	1	1
2013	2	1	3
2014	1	0	1
2016	0	2	2
2018	1	2	3
2019	1	0	1
2022	0	1	1

Below are the most recent publications written about "Comparative Effectiveness Research" by people in Profiles.

Connors JN, Kroenke K, Monahan P, Chernyak Y, Pettit K, Hayden J, Montgomery C, Brenner G, Millard M, Holmes E, Musey P. Comparing the effectiveness of existing anxiety treatment options among patients evaluated for chest pain and anxiety in the emergency department setting: Study protocol for the PACER pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 01; 124:107020.

View in: PubMed
McElfish PA, Ayers BL, Felix HC, Long CR, Bursac Z, Kaholokula JK, Riklon S, Bing W, Iban A, Yeary KHK. How stakeholder engagement influenced a randomized comparative effectiveness trial testing two Diabetes Prevention Program interventions in a Marshallese Pacific Islander Community. J Transl Med. 2019 02 11; 17(1):42.

View in: PubMed
Wilkins CH, Villalta-Gil V, Houston MM, Joosten Y, Richmond A, Vaughn YC, Stallings SC, Wallston KA. Development and validation of the Person-Centeredness of Research Scale. J Comp Eff Res. 2018 12; 7(12):1153-1159.

View in: PubMed
Boyer AP, Fair AM, Joosten YA, Dolor RJ, Williams NA, Sherden L, Stallings S, Smoot DT, Wilkins CH. A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network. Med Care. 2018 10; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S22-S26.

View in: PubMed
McElfish PA, Long CR, Kaholokula JK, Aitaoto N, Bursac Z, Capelle L, Laelan M, Bing WI, Riklon S, Rowland B, Ayers BL, Wilmoth RO, Langston KN, Schootman M, Selig JP, Yeary KHK. Design of a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial testing a faith-based Diabetes Prevention Program (WORD DPP) vs. a Pacific culturally adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (PILI DPP) for Marshallese in the United States. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May; 97(19):e0677.

View in: PubMed
Bondurant KL, Wheeler JG, Bursac Z, Holmes T, Tilford JM. Comparison of Office-Based Versus Outsourced Immunization Recall Services. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Jun; 56(6):555-563.

View in: PubMed
Ramirez N, Valentin P, Garc?a-Cartagena M, Samalot S, Iriarte I. One-step (standard) versus two-step surgical approach in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal fusion: Which is better? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Jul; 26(5):441-6.

View in: PubMed
Howie L, Hirsch B, Locklear T, Abernethy AP. Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul; 33(7):1220-8.

View in: PubMed
Gesell SB, Sommer EC, Lambert EW, Vides de Andrade AR, Whitaker L, Davis L, Beech BM, Mitchell SJ, Arinze N, Neloms S, Ryan CK, Barkin SL. Comparative effectiveness of after-school programs to increase physical activity. J Obes. 2013; 2013:576821.

View in: PubMed
Ogunyemi OI, Meeker D, Kim HE, Ashish N, Farzaneh S, Boxwala A. Identifying appropriate reference data models for comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies based on data from clinical information systems. Med Care. 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S45-52.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals