RCMI Coordinating Center (RCMI CC) Header Logo

Connection

Mark Hauber to Sex Characteristics

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Hauber has written about Sex Characteristics.
Connection Strength

1.529
  1. Luro AB, Hauber ME. Pressure for rapid and accurate mate recognition promotes avian-perceived plumage sexual dichromatism in true thrushes (genus: Turdus). J Evol Biol. 2022 11; 35(11):1558-1567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.666
  2. Igic B, Leuschner N, Parker KA, Ismar SM, Gill BJ, Lovegrove TG, Millar CD, Hauber ME. Size dimorphism and avian-perceived sexual dichromatism in a New Zealand endemic bird, the whitehead Mohoua albicilla. J Morphol. 2010 Jun; 271(6):697-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  3. Rubenstein DR, Hauber ME. Dynamic feedback between phenotype and physiology in sexually selected traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Dec; 23(12):655-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  4. Hauber ME, Louder MI, Griffith SC. Neurogenomic insights into the behavioral and vocal development of the zebra finch. Elife. 2021 06 09; 10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  5. Safran RJ, Vitousek MN, Hauber ME, Ghalambor CK. Sexual selection: a dynamic state of affairs. Response to the comments of Cornwallis and Uller in the article: towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug; 25(8):429-30; author reply 430-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  6. Safran RJ, Hauber ME. Evolutionary biology: variation isn't always sexy. Curr Biol. 2007 May 15; 17(10):R368-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  7. Merondun J, Marques CI, Andrade P, Meshcheryagina S, Galv?n I, Afonso S, Alves JM, Ara?jo PM, Bachurin G, Balacco J, B?n M, Fedrigo O, Formenti G, Foss?y F, F?l?p A, Golovatin M, Granja S, Hewson C, Honza M, Howe K, Larson G, Marton A, Mosk?t C, Mountcastle J, Proch?zka P, Red'kin Y, Sims Y, ?ulc M, Tracey A, Wood JMD, Jarvis ED, Hauber ME, Carneiro M, Wolf JBW. Evolution and genetic architecture of sex-limited polymorphism in cuckoos. Sci Adv. 2024 04 26; 10(17):eadl5255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
RCMI CC is supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health (NIH), through Grant Number U24MD015970. The contents of this site are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH

For technical support please contact support