Anne Coleman to Sensitivity and Specificity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Anne Coleman has written about Sensitivity and Specificity.
Connection Strength
0.264
-
Kitayama K, Young AG, Ochoa A, Yu F, Wong KY, Coleman AL. The Agreement Between an iPad Visual Field App and Humphrey Frequency Doubling Technology in Visual Field Screening at Health Fairs. J Glaucoma. 2021 09 01; 30(9):846-850.
Score: 0.182
-
Kinori M, Molina I, Hernandez EO, Robbins SL, Granet DB, Coleman AL, Brown SI. The PlusoptiX Photoscreener and the Retinomax Autorefractor as Community-based Screening Devices for Preschool Children. Curr Eye Res. 2018 05; 43(5):654-658.
Score: 0.036
-
Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Jain S, Becerra LM, Dirkes K, Piltz-Seymour JR, Cioffi GA, Trick GL, Coleman AL, Brandt JD, Liebmann JM, Gordon MO, Kass MA. Predicting the onset of glaucoma: the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to theOcular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep; 117(9):1674-83.
Score: 0.021
-
Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Yu F, Mavroudis L, Anastasopoulos E, Koskosas A, Pappas T, Dimitrakos S, Wilson MR. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jan; 43(1):140-5.
Score: 0.012