Andrew Wey to Registries
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Wey has written about Registries.
Connection Strength
2.850
-
Wey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Skeans M, Schaffhausen CR, Gustafson SK, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Comparing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients posttransplant program-specific outcome ratings at listing with subsequent recipient outcomes after transplant. Am J Transplant. 2019 02; 19(2):391-398.
Score: 0.483
-
Wey A, Gustafson SK, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Skeans M, Schaffhausen CR, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing. Am J Transplant. 2019 02; 19(2):399-406.
Score: 0.482
-
Wey A, Pyke J, Schladt DP, Gentry SE, Weaver T, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant. Liver Transpl. 2018 04; 24(4):478-487.
Score: 0.469
-
Wey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. A Five-Tier System for Improving the Categorization of Transplant Program Performance. Health Serv Res. 2018 06; 53(3):1979-1991.
Score: 0.444
-
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S, Wey A, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK. The importance of transplant program measures: Surveys of three national patient advocacy groups. Clin Transplant. 2018 12; 32(12):e13426.
Score: 0.122
-
Wey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Skeans M, Schaffhausen CR, Gustafson SK, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Five-tier utility: A start on the path to better reporting, in response to Schold and Buccini. Am J Transplant. 2019 02; 19(2):608-609.
Score: 0.122
-
Kasiske BL, Wey A, Salkowski N, Zaun D, Schaffhausen CR, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2019 02; 19(2):317-323.
Score: 0.121
-
Wey A, Salkowski N, Kremers WK, Schaffhausen CR, Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. A kidney offer acceptance decision tool to inform the decision to accept an offer or wait for a better kidney. Am J Transplant. 2018 04; 18(4):897-906.
Score: 0.114
-
Wey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Influence of kidney offer acceptance behavior on metrics of allocation efficiency. Clin Transplant. 2017 Sep; 31(9).
Score: 0.112
-
Kasiske BL, Salkowski N, Wey A, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Potential Implications of Recent and Proposed Changes in the Regulatory Oversight of Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2016 12; 16(12):3371-3377.
Score: 0.104
-
Salkowski N, Wey A, Snyder JJ, Orlowski JP, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. The clinical relevance of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network screening criteria for program performance review in the United States. Clin Transplant. 2016 09; 30(9):1066-73.
Score: 0.104
-
Snyder JJ, Salkowski N, Wey A, Israni AK, Schold JD, Segev DL, Kasiske BL. Effects of High-Risk Kidneys on Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Program Quality Reports. Am J Transplant. 2016 09; 16(9):2646-53.
Score: 0.102
-
Lehr CJ, Wey A, Skeans MA, Lease ED, Valapour M. Impact of incorporating long-term survival for calculating transplant benefit in the US lung transplant allocation system. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 07; 41(7):866-873.
Score: 0.038
-
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S, Wey A, McKinney WT, Snyder JJ, Lake JR, Matas AJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK. Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey. Transplantation. 2020 01; 104(1):201-210.
Score: 0.033