Groesbeck Parham to Sensitivity and Specificity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Groesbeck Parham has written about Sensitivity and Specificity.
Connection Strength
0.424
-
Hu L, Mwanahamuntu MH, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Barrett C, Horning MP, Shah I, Laverriere Z, Banik D, Ji Y, Shibemba AL, Chisele S, Munalula MK, Kaunga F, Musonda F, Malyangu E, Hariharan KM, Parham GP. Internal validation of Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE) on smartphone images for cervical cancer screening in a prospective study in Zambia. Cancer Med. 2024 Jun; 13(11):e7355.
Score: 0.213
-
Chibwesha CJ, Frett B, Katundu K, Bateman AC, Shibemba A, Kapambwe S, Mwanahamuntu MH, Banda S, Hamusimbi C, Polepole P, Parham GP. Clinical Performance Validation of 4 Point-of-Care Cervical Cancer Screening Tests in HIV-Infected Women in Zambia. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jul; 20(3):218-23.
Score: 0.123
-
Parham GP. Comparison of cell collection and direct visualization cervical cancer screening adjuncts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar; 188(3 Suppl):S13-20.
Score: 0.049
-
Bateman AC, Parham GP, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Mwanahamuntu MH, Kapambwe S, Katundu K, Nkole T, Mulundika J, Pfaendler KS, Hicks ML, Shibemba A, Vermund SH, Stringer JS, Chibwesha CJ. Clinical performance of digital cervicography and cytology for cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women in Lusaka, Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Oct 01; 67(2):212-5.
Score: 0.027
-
Cronj? HS, Parham GP, Cooreman BF, de Beer A, Divall P, Bam RH. A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia in a developing country. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb; 188(2):395-400.
Score: 0.012